Load Matching Design of Rails and Fastening Systems

Dec 25, 2025 Leave a message

Load Matching Design of Rails and Fastening Systems

 

What are the core principles for matching rail type with fastening system load?

The core principle is consistent load rating. The rail type determines its load-bearing capacity, and the fastening system's spring clips, bolts, and clamps must provide corresponding strength in fixing force. 43kg/m and 50kg/m standard rails are compatible with ordinary strength spring clips, bolts, and clamps, meeting the load requirements of conventional lines. 60kg/m and 75kg/m heavy-duty rails require high-strength fastening components, such as 35CrMoA bolts and thickened clamps. During matching, it is essential to ensure that the strength rating of all components is consistent to avoid "strong rail, weak components" leading to fastening system failure first, or "weak rail, strong components" causing excessive stress and damage to the rail. The core objective is to achieve performance synergy between the rail and the fastening system, ensuring overall track safety.

 

e-clip-fastening-systen-1

 

How to select rail and fastening system combinations for lines with different load ratings?

For lines with ordinary loads (such as local railways and dedicated lines), U71Mn national standard rails can be used, paired with Q235 bolts, ordinary elastic clips, and rubber pads to meet the foundation load-bearing requirements. For lines with medium loads (such as mainline railways), U75V national standard rails or European S355JR rails can be selected, combined with 45# steel bolts and conventional clamping elastic clips, balancing strength and economy. For heavy-haul lines (such as the Datong-Qinhuangdao Railway), U75V national standard rails or American AAR M102 Grade 115 rails are required, matched with 35CrMoA high-strength bolts and high-rigidity composite pads to withstand the impact of large axle loads. High-frequency transport lines require enhanced component fatigue performance, using wear-resistant elastic clips and bolts to extend service life. Load selection requires a comprehensive assessment of the line's design axle load, transport volume, and operating speed.

 

e-clip-fastening-system02181

 

What are the hazards of "strong rail, weak component" or "weak rail, strong component"?

"Strong rail, weak components" refers to a situation where the rail has a high load-bearing capacity but the fastening system is insufficiently strong. During train operation, the fastening system is prone to bolt breakage, elastic clip deformation, and other malfunctions, leading to rail loosening and displacement, affecting train safety. "Weak rail, strong components" refers to a situation where the fastening system is too strong but the rail's load-bearing capacity is insufficient. Under the combined action of fastening force and train load, the rail is prone to cracking and breakage, causing serious track accidents. Both situations disrupt the stress balance of the track structure, accelerate component aging and damage, and increase maintenance costs and failure frequency. Long-term operation may also lead to inaccurate track geometry parameters and a deterioration of the wheel-rail relationship, further increasing safety risks.

 

rail fastening system

 

What are the differences in rail-fastening system matching between ballastless and ballasted tracks?

The rail-fastening system of ballastless tracks needs enhanced elasticity and insulation performance. High-elasticity elastic clips are selected, paired with low-stiffness rail pads to reduce vibration transmission. The fastening system of ballasted tracks focuses more on vertical load-bearing stability. The elastic clip clamping pressure can be appropriately increased, and medium-stiffness pads are selected to balance vibration reduction and cost. Components such as bolts and clamps in ballastless tracks require higher corrosion resistance to adapt to enclosed environments like bridges and tunnels; components in ballasted tracks must withstand complex environments such as dust and humidity, demanding higher surface protection. Ballastless tracks transmit loads more directly, requiring more uniform strength matching among components in the fastening system; ballasted tracks distribute some load through the ballast, resulting in relatively lower load pressure on the fastening system.

 

How to verify if the load matching between the rail and the fastening system meets standards?

Static load tests are conducted to check the load-bearing capacity of the combined components, simulating the maximum design axle load, and observing for deformation or damage to the rail and fastening system. Fatigue tests are performed to simulate long-term train operation loads, cycling millions of times to check for component failure and verify service life. On-site measurements of wheel-rail forces, component stresses, and displacements during line operation ensure they are within reasonable ranges. Line dynamics simulation analysis is used to simulate system response under different operating conditions and optimize the matching scheme. Finally, the strength, stiffness, and other indicators of each component are comprehensively tested against industry standards and design requirements to ensure overall performance meets standards.